Files
reliquary/docs/workpad/journals/2026-10-05-21-athanor.md
T

60 lines
11 KiB
Markdown
Raw Blame History

This file contains ambiguous Unicode characters
This file contains Unicode characters that might be confused with other characters. If you think that this is intentional, you can safely ignore this warning. Use the Escape button to reveal them.
# Athanor — Igor Session Journal
**Date**: 2026-10-05
**Topic**: athanor — adjusting the development system (Athanor) for Opus 5.5
**Worktree/branch**: main
## Log
<!-- Append-only. This journal is the testimony of one path through the problem: record the tangents and dead ends, not only the results. The path can't be walked again; the record can be read. -->
- 21:00 — Session start. `spire:igor` skill not registered in this remote session (`/reload-plugins` unavailable remotely); loaded skill from `plugins/spire/skills/igor/SKILL.md` directly. Spire agent types (athanor, researcher, search, adept…) not available as subagent_types — using general-purpose with explicit model.
- 21:00 — Pulled main: f1de89e..08e22a7 (codex plugin icons/metadata, no Athanor changes).
- 21:00 — Read `plugins/spire/agents/athanor.md` (pinned `claude-opus-4-6`; skills: spire:project, spire:workpad, spire:implementation, superpowers:*) and `plugins/spire/skills/implementation/SKILL.md`. There is no separate athanor skill.
- 21:00 — Dispatched two search agents (Sonnet): ../spacecraft and ../dirigent, looking for recent reports about Athanor usage. User notes dirigent definitely has one.
- 21:10 — Dirigent search back → `research/2026-10-05-21-athanor-usage-dirigent.md`. Primary source: dirigent `reports/2026-10-01-lean-process-report.md` + 2026-10-05 addendum addressed to spire authors. Key: athanor's internal end review (pinned 4.6) found 0 issues; independent Opus 5.5 review found 6 Important (incl. archive data loss). Proposals: model-id guard rails, plans/reviews outside athanor, per-block owner model, foreground-only grandchildren, athanor's job ends at blocks+tests+run log. Secondary: `2026-09-23-14-stalled-agents-forensics.md` (rate-limit kill, unclosed state).
- 21:12 — Spacecraft search back → `research/2026-10-05-21-athanor-usage-spacecraft.md`. Spacecraft's "athanor" = superpowers `dispatching-orchestrator` (model: opus), not Spire's agent — same role, so findings transfer. Primary: `reports/2026-09-29-13-orchestration-overhead-attribution.md`, `reports/2026-09-27-13-strategy-mvp-retrospective/report.md`. Converges with dirigent: lean review (per hotspot/phase), foreground dispatch (bg grandchildren stall orchestrator), never carry implementer across tasks (960k tokens), `model: opus` alias silently overrode 4.6 pins (184/184 → 5.5), 5.5 plans ~11× oversized, weaken-check reflex, tests that can't fail.
- 21:20 — User direction: overhaul/rewrite implementation skill + athanor for lean implementation. Points: superpowers ceremony (many pitstops) is the problem with 5.5; 5.5 plans excellent but long; review/test runs slow dev; build larger chunks, review once per phase; "attack the plan" after it is written; Sonnet experiment was partly plan issues, not only model; spawning rails per harness and per model; trunk-and-forks idea (adept-like trunk implementer, forks per task, updated by orchestrator, may live a whole phase); 5.5 fine to ~600k, both extremes (tiny implementers / keep-implementer) failed; skill must be lean and leave decision room — don't encode incidents as law. Dirigent lean report named as most mature source.
- 21:20 — Dispatched Opus general-purpose agent → `reports/2026-10-05-21-implementation-skill-redesign.md` (diagnosis, principles, lean cycle, trunk-and-forks feasibility, classification principle/reference/project-setting/not-encoded, proposed SKILL.md outline + athanor changes, open questions).
- 21:30 — Redesign report back → `reports/2026-10-05-21-implementation-skill-redesign.md` (author stamped claude-opus-5-5). Lean loop with explicit "attack the plan" step producing a separate build plan; athanor → build furnace pinned 5.5, superpowers dropped; reviews Igor-side. Trunk/forks: `fork` copies the caller → athanor itself must be the trunk; variant A (trunk notes) as baseline, B (athanor forks per complex block) as trial; preflight proposed. Classification table separates principle/reference/project/not-encoded. 7 open questions. Igor's notes: proposed SKILL grows 95→130-160 lines + 3 references + 2 new role agents — check against user's "lean skill" demand.
- 21:40 — User: sizes are guesstimates for now (dirigent will work on orchestrator token introspection / signals into running work); Igor must own the design direction it delegates, not relay agent output. Asked how Igor understands "attacking the plan". Checked dirigent lean report: origin is the ~10-min step "plan comparison (adversarial, against the code, ~6 min) → amendment (fold blockers into plan B, cut into 6 blocks, ~4 min)" — "cheapest quality gate of the day". Igor's reading: the attack is the upstream counterweight that makes dropping per-task pitstops safe; the redesign report weighted it as restructuring and left the adversarial-against-code half as an optional merge — inverted emphasis. Also: athanor end review merely replayed the comparison's risk checklist → attack output must not become the reviewer's scope.
- 21:50 — User corrections: superpowers not abandoned — rules changed (reports agree: spacecraft kept it, overrode via CLAUDE.local.md/templates/memories; dirigent kept athanor + lean brief). Redesign report's "drop superpowers" was the agent's proposal, not evidence. Model: `opus` alias passes Igor's model to the athanor; the "Pass" review was a 4.6 session (user's attribution; dirigent report could only say "unknown"). Model traits per user: 4.6 fast, capable, sometimes better at intent; 5.5 catches more, bolder decisions, can replace frequent small reviews (esp. Rust), but tends to take user's word as holy or reverse 100%. Igor gave its own athanor-process restructure in chat (see next entries).
- 21:55 — Igor proposed Athanor restructure (Igor-side plan → attack → brief with deliberate model; Athanor phase turns: intake=trunk + trunk notes → foreground blocks, forks for complex trunk-area blocks, fresh for mechanical → gate → tests once → run log; Igor-side phase review with stamped id → resume Athanor for fix → next phase or fresh Athanor). User: fully agreed. 5.5 is the default; 4.6 to be replaced eventually but useful as "understanding the human" interpreter (Fable better). Keep superpowers as tools, drop subagent-driven-development preload. Future: grill-me or own playbook for plans; journals helped and are worth mining; dirigent now writes properly sized plans.
- 22:00 — Wrote goal `goals/lean-athanor.md`. Decided to skip separate design+plan stages: markdown-only change, goal is precise — the goal is the spec. Dispatched one Opus implementer (general-purpose, model opus) → commits on main + `reports/2026-10-05-22-lean-athanor-implementation.md`. Fresh reviewer against the goal to follow.
- 22:05 — User: bump the plugin version once the work is finished (Codex will also report how it performs). Told the implementer to skip its version bump; Igor bumps after review.
- 22:12 — Implementer back (stamped claude-opus-5-5): commits `e515207`, `146a48c` on main, not pushed; report `reports/2026-10-05-22-lean-athanor-implementation.md` (uncommitted). SKILL.md 85 lines + 3 references; athanor pinned 5.5, preloads project/workpad/implementation; Igor stage 4b + phase review; harness-notes → pointer. No version bump. Flags: adept dispatch examples pass `opus` over 4.6 pin; igor/adept/zathras still pinned 4.6; harness "verified" = schema only; spire:project template lacks build-setting fields.
- 22:12 — Dispatched fresh Opus reviewer against the goal → `reports/2026-10-05-22-lean-athanor-review.md`.
- 22:20 — Review back (stamped claude-opus-5-5): pass with fixes, C0/I3/M8, 22/25 goal boxes met. I1 adept examples pass `opus` over pin; I2 nothing ensures plan/attack/review run on 5.5; I3 model-tiers routes research+impl to athanor as one brief. Notable minors: alias evidence confounded (use spacecraft 184/184); athanor pin lacks `[1m]` unlike other pins; fork availability itself unverified. Decision: one fix pass by resuming the implementer (≈150k ctx, resume from root is safe) — our own lean loop. Re-pin question stays with user.
- 22:35 — Fix pass back: commit `5909221` (I1–I3 fixed, cheap minors fixed, `[1m]` left for user; fix-pass section appended to implementation report). Dispatched fresh Opus scoped re-check of I1–I3 only → appends to review report. Pending user: re-pin igor/adept/zathras; `[1m]` on athanor pin; then version bump 0.2.0, commit reports+journal, push on approval.
- 22:40 — Re-check back (stamped claude-opus-5-5): I1–I3 confirmed fixed, no new Critical/Important. Loop stops here per stop rule. Logged minor: "Planned implementation" row (igor/SKILL.md:81, model-tiers.md:11) doesn't say the plan must be attacked first. Awaiting user decisions on pins before version bump.
- 22:45 — User: athanor pin → `claude-opus-5-5[1m]`; zathras too. Igor and adept not re-pinned (stay `claude-opus-4-6[1m]`) — not decided, left as is. Dispatched Sonnet for pins + version bump 0.2.0 (both plugin.json) + commit of goal, reports, research, journal (explicit paths; user's own goal/spec edits untouched). No push yet.
- 22:50 — Committed `f40cbf5` (🤖 pins athanor+zathras → claude-opus-5-5[1m], spire 0.2.0 in both plugin.json; marketplace files carry no version) and `b0b3151` (📝 workpad: goal, journal, research, reports). Main is 6 commits ahead of origin, unpushed; awaiting user go for push.
- 22:55 — User: pin Igor too; only Pinky stays 4.6 (no Pinky agent exists in Spire yet). Re-pinned igor + adept → `claude-opus-5-5[1m]` (all Opus-pinned Spire agents now 5.5[1m]); updated pin note in spawning reference. Version stays 0.2.0 for this release; optimization = 0.2.1. Wrote goal `goals/lean-athanor-0.2.1.md` from open threads. Pushing to origin, then updating the plugin install for dirigent and spacecraft so they can run their next implementation pass on it.
## Adepts
- Roster empty at boot (no adepts in this workpad).
## Artifacts
- `docs/workpad/research/2026-10-05-21-athanor-usage-dirigent.md`
- `docs/workpad/research/2026-10-05-21-athanor-usage-spacecraft.md`
- `docs/workpad/reports/2026-10-05-21-implementation-skill-redesign.md`
- `docs/workpad/goals/lean-athanor.md`
- `docs/workpad/goals/lean-athanor-0.2.1.md`
- `docs/workpad/reports/2026-10-05-22-lean-athanor-implementation.md`
- `docs/workpad/reports/2026-10-05-22-lean-athanor-review.md`
- Commits `e515207`, `146a48c`, `5909221` (main, unpushed)
## Open threads
- Version bump (Claude + Codex plugin.json, marketplace if it carries one) after review passes.
- Trunk-and-forks preflight + trial (venue TBD).
- Mine journals for deeper insights (future).
- Minor: "Planned implementation" delegation row should note plan must be attacked first.
- Follow-up: build-setting fields in `spire:project` template; pinned 5.5 planner/reviewer role agents (user decision).
## Graduation candidates
- Attacking the plan = adversarial check against the code + reshape into build chunks, ~10 min; it is what pays for removing per-task review. (Rationale: easy to misread as mere regrouping; the misreading loses the quality gate.)