🤖 Guidance pass D4: drop general knowledge and filler from read-only agents, workpad, research

2026-10-17 00:32:05 +02:00
parent fc6a543162
commit fa80d26309
11 changed files with 28 additions and 140 deletions
@@ -27,8 +27,6 @@ After the plan is written, a fresh agent that did not write it **tests it advers

 A plan written before earlier phases landed may be stale. The attack checks it against the code as it is now; it reads the previous phase's run log and review only when something is off.

-This step is what pays for dropping per-task review. A plan checked against the code catches in minutes what many small reviews would find one by one, or not at all. Without it, lean is just less review.
-
 The build plan sets defaults: block size, owner model per block, the gate per block, what may stay broken between blocks. It may place an extra review at a hotspot if it says why. Its risk list shapes the build. It is not the phase reviewer's scope: a reviewer handed a checklist tends to confirm the checklist.

 A plan holds decisions, the code structure, contracts, invariants and the scope fence. Code goes in only where its exact form is the decision (a schema, a wire format, a state machine, the main signatures): every line of code in a plan becomes an obligation for the build. Whatever tool wrote the plan, the attack is the same.
@@ -23,7 +23,6 @@ Opus 5.5 for the Athanor, planning, attacking plans and phase review (user direc
 - Fast and capable. Sometimes better than 5.5 at interpreting what the user means; useful as an "understanding the human" interpreter. To be replaced eventually. (user, 2026-10-05)
 - A 4.6 plan misidentified a root cause and would have broken archive compatibility; one plan, one comparison (dirigent, 2026-10-01).
 - The dirigent Athanor end review that passed with zero findings ran on 4.6 (user's attribution, 2026-10-05; the report recorded "model unknown").
- Withdrawn 2026-10-05: "prefer Opus 4.6 for implementation" and "Opus 5 tends to hallucinate" (former Igor model-tier notes, 2026-09). The 5.5 evidence above contradicts them.

 ## Fable