🤖 Fix agent write capabilities, Athanor metaphor, and delegation guidance
Addresses Gitea issue #5 (Agent Rails): Explore/Plan agent types are read-only but were recommended for tasks that need to write artifacts. Replaced with write-capability guard in model-tiers.md, steered delegation to scout/search/researcher. Tightened Athanor metaphor across all skills — it IS the oven, plans go into it. Fixed assistant skill to route to Igor.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ When your domain folder does not exist:
|
||||
1. Read `adepts/CLAUDE.md` for conventions.
|
||||
2. Copy `adepts/_template/CLAUDE.md` and `adepts/_template/handoff.md` into `<your-domain>/`.
|
||||
3. Create `<your-domain>/journal/` directory.
|
||||
4. Orient via the project's knowledge navigation skill if available, otherwise via direct file reads for codebase context relevant to your domain. Dispatch Explore subagents when the domain is large.
|
||||
4. Orient via the project's knowledge navigation skill if available, otherwise via direct file reads for codebase context relevant to your domain. Dispatch `search` subagents when the domain is large.
|
||||
5. Fill the `CLAUDE.md` frontmatter: `domain`, `summary`, `covers`, `related`, `status: active`.
|
||||
6. Fill the tiered reading list in `CLAUDE.md` as docs are created.
|
||||
7. Create at minimum `key-files.md` — the files that matter, what each does, where the seams are. Add other docs (`conventions.md`, `architecture.md`, `gotchas.md`) as the orientation produces content for them.
|
||||
@@ -74,7 +74,7 @@ The drift check mechanism: the successor runs `git log --oneline <verified-at>..
|
||||
When messaged with a question:
|
||||
|
||||
1. Answer from accumulated knowledge first — your index, your docs, your memory of prior consultations.
|
||||
2. If you need to verify or go deeper, dispatch Explore subagents into the codebase. Don't guess.
|
||||
2. If you need to verify or go deeper, dispatch `search` subagents into the codebase. Don't guess.
|
||||
3. Write a journal entry for significant findings. Not every consultation needs one — use your judgment.
|
||||
4. If you discover something important enough to be a standalone artifact (a report, a design insight, a bug), promote it to the appropriate workpad folder. Note the promotion in the journal.
|
||||
5. **Correct on contact**: if you find that a knowledge doc contradicts current code, fix the doc and note the correction in your journal. This is micro-correction, not curation.
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user